A practical comparison

n8n vs Zapier vs Make

Compare automation builders, AI-agent orchestration, integrations, hosting, execution costs, strengths and weaknesses.

21 criteria Three tools 10 official sources

Official sources

Swipe the table to compare tools. Criteria stay pinned.

n8n vs Zapier vs Make: detailed side-by-side comparison
Feature / criterion
n8n
Official site
Zapier
Official site
Make
Official site

Strengths, weaknesses & buyer fit

The fit judgments below are editorial interpretations of documented capabilities, not hands-on speed rankings.

Best fitTechnical workflows

Teams that want custom logic, agents and hosting control.

[2][3]
Business app automation

Teams wanting a guided route between familiar apps.

[4]
Visual process builders

Teams wanting to inspect branches and data movement on a canvas.

[7][10]
Main strengthControl and flexibility

Combine AI with explicit workflow logic and custom tools.

[2]
Broad app ecosystem

A large integration catalogue supports common business hand-offs.

[4]
Visible branching

Routers split scenarios into condition-based routes.

[10]
Main weaknessOperating effort

Self-hosting requires deployment, security and maintenance skills.

[3]
Task costs can grow

Repeated successful actions add up across multi-step workflows.

[5]
Credit usage needs modelling

Data bundles and AI features can change consumption.

[8]
HostingCloud or self-hosted

Choose managed hosting or take responsibility for your instance.

[1][3]
Managed platform

Evaluate offered governance and connection controls for your team.

[4]
Managed platform

Enterprise on-prem connectivity is not full self-hosting.

[7]
Choose another option if…No one owns operations

Use managed hosting if you cannot maintain the underlying service.

[3]
You need instance control

Review n8n when running the workflow engine yourself is essential.

[3]
Your flow is very simple

A visual graph may add setup effort to a single app-to-app action.

[10]

Workflow building & integrations

Workflow structureNodes and explicit logic

Connect data, models and tools into a controlled workflow.

[2]
Triggers and actions

Build Zaps; paid plans add multi-step capabilities.

[4]
Scenarios and modules

Connect modules and route bundles through the scenario.

[7][10]
Integration coverageNodes plus custom APIs

Check required actions, authentication and payload support.

[1]
9,000+ advertised apps

App count alone does not confirm a particular action is supported.

[4]
3,000+ advertised apps

Check the exact module and operation you need.

[7]
BranchingMix rules with AI

Keep predictable steps explicit; delegate ambiguous decisions selectively.

[2]
Multi-step workflows

Confirm plan access for the required routing features.

[4]
Routers and filters

Process routes in a configured order; a router is not automatic parallelism.

[10]
Custom systemsHTTP and code steps

Useful when a standard connector does not cover your API.

[1]
Webhooks

Professional lists webhook access for custom event-driven connections.

[4]
API and custom apps

Available routes depend on the service API and chosen plan.

[7]
Maintenance checkOwn credentials and runtime

Back up and update self-hosted deployments.

[3]
Monitor action results

Track task usage and failed or repeated runs.

[5]
Inspect data flow

Check route conditions and credit-heavy modules.

[8][10]

AI agents & orchestration

Agent buildingCustom AI workflows

Coordinate models, memory, tools and explicit workflow steps.

[2]
Zapier Agents

Give agents instructions and access to connected application actions.

[6]
Make AI Agents

Use agent tools within the scenario-based automation environment.

[9]
Multiple agentsExplicit coordination

Build specialist agents with defined roles and hand-offs.

[2]
Define each behaviour

Verify the available hand-off actions instead of assuming shared context.

[6]
Design tool boundaries

Use scenarios and tools deliberately; do not assume autonomous collaboration.

[9]
Human reviewHuman-in-the-loop steps

Add approvals around consequential agent actions.

[2]
Restrict connected actions

Give the agent only the actions its job requires.

[6]
Control agent tools

Review the inputs and effects of exposed scenarios.

[9]
Model and data costsAccount for provider usage

Include model calls and infrastructure in the total budget.

[2][3]
Separate Agents allowance

Agent activities are not the same as ordinary Zap tasks.

[4]
Provider-dependent credits

Make AI Provider and your own connections have different cost components.

[8]
Token efficiencyNo measured winner

Model choice, context and retries determine token use.

No measured winner

A task or activity count is not a token measurement.

No measured winner

A credit is not a universal fixed quantity of tokens.

Pricing, usage units & limits

Starting prices are not equivalent bundles. Check currency, billing term, taxes, usage tier and AI-provider charges before purchasing.

Free entry pointSelf-hosted Community Edition

Cloud offers a trial; infrastructure still costs time or money.

[1][3]
Free: 100 tasks/month

Basic entry plan; confirm feature eligibility for your workflow.

[4]
Free: 1,000 credits/month

Includes limited active scenarios and a 15-minute scheduling minimum.

[7]
Representative starting priceStarter: €20/month

Billed annually; 2,500 workflow executions.

[1]
Professional: from US$19.99/month

Displayed starting rate; check billing term and task tier in the selector.

[4]
Core: displayed US$9/month

At 10,000 credits; confirm billing term at checkout.

[7]
What gets countedWorkflow executions

A workflow run is the primary billing unit, rather than each step.

[1]
Successful actions

Tasks count qualifying actions; some built-in tools are exempt.

[5]
Credits

Most standard operations use one; some AI features consume more.

[8]
Illustrative 100-lead flow100 executions

Assume one workflow run per lead, no additional runs or retries.

[1]
300 tasks

Assume three billable successful actions per lead; excludes exempt steps.

[5]
300 credits

Assume exactly three one-credit operations per lead; excludes polling and AI.

[8]
Why actual bills differMore runs and hosting

Schedules, retries and model usage change the total.

More actions and products

Extra steps, Agents allowances and task tiers affect spend.

[4][5]
Bundles and AI consumption

Loops, repeated items and variable-credit modules affect spend.

[8]
Scaling decisionModel the full system

Include maintenance and throughput, not only execution price.

[3]
Model action volume

Count real successful actions from representative runs.

[5]
Model module consumption

Measure credits from actual scenario history and AI usage.

[8]

Make the choice practical

Price the same business outcome

Example: receive a lead, add it to a CRM, create a follow-up task and notify the team. The table uses explicit simplified billing assumptions, not a benchmark. Run a small pilot and count triggers, polling, branches, duplicate events, retries and model charges before forecasting a monthly bill.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheapest?

There is no universal cheapest option. A long workflow may favour execution-based billing, while a small simple workflow may fit a free plan. Compare actual billable runs, actions or credits plus AI and hosting costs.

Is self-hosted n8n completely free?

Community Edition is an available self-hosted option, but servers, backups, security work and model-provider usage still have costs. Paid capabilities and licensing requirements must be checked for your intended use.

Are tasks, executions and credits equivalent?

No. They count different things. The worked example is illustrative and deliberately excludes retries, polling and variable AI charges; it is not a promise of the bill you will receive.

Sources & editorial notes

Official pages checked on . Pricing and features can vary by region, plan and rollout. The source links support the feature descriptions; buyer-fit judgments are editorial interpretation.

  1. n8n: pricing and executions
  2. n8n: AI agents and orchestration
  3. n8n: self-hosting
  4. Zapier: plans and product allowances
  5. Zapier: task usage
  6. Zapier: Agents
  7. Make: plans
  8. Make: credits
  9. Make: AI Agents
  10. Make: routers

This is a documentation-based comparison. We have not run a controlled performance benchmark or measured a token-efficiency winner.

Help us improve Discover the Tools

May we use Google Analytics cookies to understand visits and improve the website? You can change your choice at any time. Privacy policy