A practical comparison
n8n vs Zapier vs Make
Compare automation builders, AI-agent orchestration, integrations, hosting, execution costs, strengths and weaknesses.

21 criteria Three tools 10 official sources
Official sourcesSwipe the table to compare tools. Criteria stay pinned.
| Feature / criterion | n8n Official site | Zapier Official site | Make Official site |
|---|---|---|---|
Strengths, weaknesses & buyer fit | |||
The fit judgments below are editorial interpretations of documented capabilities, not hands-on speed rankings. | |||
| Best fit | Technical workflows Teams that want custom logic, agents and hosting control. [2][3] | Business app automation Teams wanting a guided route between familiar apps. [4] | Visual process builders Teams wanting to inspect branches and data movement on a canvas. [7][10] |
| Main strength | Control and flexibility Combine AI with explicit workflow logic and custom tools. [2] | Broad app ecosystem A large integration catalogue supports common business hand-offs. [4] | Visible branching Routers split scenarios into condition-based routes. [10] |
| Main weakness | Operating effort Self-hosting requires deployment, security and maintenance skills. [3] | Task costs can grow Repeated successful actions add up across multi-step workflows. [5] | Credit usage needs modelling Data bundles and AI features can change consumption. [8] |
| Hosting | Cloud or self-hosted Choose managed hosting or take responsibility for your instance. [1][3] | Managed platform Evaluate offered governance and connection controls for your team. [4] | Managed platform Enterprise on-prem connectivity is not full self-hosting. [7] |
| Choose another option if… | No one owns operations Use managed hosting if you cannot maintain the underlying service. [3] | You need instance control Review n8n when running the workflow engine yourself is essential. [3] | Your flow is very simple A visual graph may add setup effort to a single app-to-app action. [10] |
Workflow building & integrations | |||
| Workflow structure | Nodes and explicit logic Connect data, models and tools into a controlled workflow. [2] | Triggers and actions Build Zaps; paid plans add multi-step capabilities. [4] | Scenarios and modules Connect modules and route bundles through the scenario. [7][10] |
| Integration coverage | Nodes plus custom APIs Check required actions, authentication and payload support. [1] | 9,000+ advertised apps App count alone does not confirm a particular action is supported. [4] | 3,000+ advertised apps Check the exact module and operation you need. [7] |
| Branching | Mix rules with AI Keep predictable steps explicit; delegate ambiguous decisions selectively. [2] | Multi-step workflows Confirm plan access for the required routing features. [4] | Routers and filters Process routes in a configured order; a router is not automatic parallelism. [10] |
| Custom systems | HTTP and code steps Useful when a standard connector does not cover your API. [1] | Webhooks Professional lists webhook access for custom event-driven connections. [4] | API and custom apps Available routes depend on the service API and chosen plan. [7] |
| Maintenance check | Own credentials and runtime Back up and update self-hosted deployments. [3] | Monitor action results Track task usage and failed or repeated runs. [5] | Inspect data flow Check route conditions and credit-heavy modules. [8][10] |
AI agents & orchestration | |||
| Agent building | Custom AI workflows Coordinate models, memory, tools and explicit workflow steps. [2] | Zapier Agents Give agents instructions and access to connected application actions. [6] | Make AI Agents Use agent tools within the scenario-based automation environment. [9] |
| Multiple agents | Explicit coordination Build specialist agents with defined roles and hand-offs. [2] | Define each behaviour Verify the available hand-off actions instead of assuming shared context. [6] | Design tool boundaries Use scenarios and tools deliberately; do not assume autonomous collaboration. [9] |
| Human review | Human-in-the-loop steps Add approvals around consequential agent actions. [2] | Restrict connected actions Give the agent only the actions its job requires. [6] | Control agent tools Review the inputs and effects of exposed scenarios. [9] |
| Model and data costs | Account for provider usage Include model calls and infrastructure in the total budget. [2][3] | Separate Agents allowance Agent activities are not the same as ordinary Zap tasks. [4] | Provider-dependent credits Make AI Provider and your own connections have different cost components. [8] |
| Token efficiency | No measured winner Model choice, context and retries determine token use. | No measured winner A task or activity count is not a token measurement. | No measured winner A credit is not a universal fixed quantity of tokens. |
Pricing, usage units & limits | |||
Starting prices are not equivalent bundles. Check currency, billing term, taxes, usage tier and AI-provider charges before purchasing. | |||
| Free entry point | Self-hosted Community Edition Cloud offers a trial; infrastructure still costs time or money. [1][3] | Free: 100 tasks/month Basic entry plan; confirm feature eligibility for your workflow. [4] | Free: 1,000 credits/month Includes limited active scenarios and a 15-minute scheduling minimum. [7] |
| Representative starting price | Starter: €20/month Billed annually; 2,500 workflow executions. [1] | Professional: from US$19.99/month Displayed starting rate; check billing term and task tier in the selector. [4] | Core: displayed US$9/month At 10,000 credits; confirm billing term at checkout. [7] |
| What gets counted | Workflow executions A workflow run is the primary billing unit, rather than each step. [1] | Successful actions Tasks count qualifying actions; some built-in tools are exempt. [5] | Credits Most standard operations use one; some AI features consume more. [8] |
| Illustrative 100-lead flow | 100 executions Assume one workflow run per lead, no additional runs or retries. [1] | 300 tasks Assume three billable successful actions per lead; excludes exempt steps. [5] | 300 credits Assume exactly three one-credit operations per lead; excludes polling and AI. [8] |
| Why actual bills differ | More runs and hosting Schedules, retries and model usage change the total. | More actions and products Extra steps, Agents allowances and task tiers affect spend. [4][5] | Bundles and AI consumption Loops, repeated items and variable-credit modules affect spend. [8] |
| Scaling decision | Model the full system Include maintenance and throughput, not only execution price. [3] | Model action volume Count real successful actions from representative runs. [5] | Model module consumption Measure credits from actual scenario history and AI usage. [8] |
Make the choice practical
Price the same business outcome
Example: receive a lead, add it to a CRM, create a follow-up task and notify the team. The table uses explicit simplified billing assumptions, not a benchmark. Run a small pilot and count triggers, polling, branches, duplicate events, retries and model charges before forecasting a monthly bill.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheapest?
There is no universal cheapest option. A long workflow may favour execution-based billing, while a small simple workflow may fit a free plan. Compare actual billable runs, actions or credits plus AI and hosting costs.
Is self-hosted n8n completely free?
Community Edition is an available self-hosted option, but servers, backups, security work and model-provider usage still have costs. Paid capabilities and licensing requirements must be checked for your intended use.
Are tasks, executions and credits equivalent?
No. They count different things. The worked example is illustrative and deliberately excludes retries, polling and variable AI charges; it is not a promise of the bill you will receive.
Sources & editorial notes
Official pages checked on . Pricing and features can vary by region, plan and rollout. The source links support the feature descriptions; buyer-fit judgments are editorial interpretation.
- n8n: pricing and executions
- n8n: AI agents and orchestration
- n8n: self-hosting
- Zapier: plans and product allowances
- Zapier: task usage
- Zapier: Agents
- Make: plans
- Make: credits
- Make: AI Agents
- Make: routers
This is a documentation-based comparison. We have not run a controlled performance benchmark or measured a token-efficiency winner.